Give today to bring the USNWSAP to life and drive lasting change in drowning prevention.

LJ 6 Establish National Minimum Testing Standards for Flotation Devices

Key area

Life Jackets

Develop and implement a national minimum standard for testing of flotation devices used for nonboating water recreation, including swimming, to ensure they reduce potential risk of drowning, if used properly.

Spectrum level: Influencing Policy and Legislation

Evidence level: Low

Implementation levels: National

Rationale:

If products were developed that allow for water recreation while offering protection from drowning in the event of an unexpected loss of buoyancy, lives would likely be saved. Flotation devices designed for swimmers might also help overcome the common misconception that life jackets are only for people who do not know how to swim.

Most drownings occur when people are recreating in the water (e.g. swimming, wading). It seems likely that some type of flotation device could be lifesaving for such victims. When should they be used, however, and by whom? Could new designs and standards be required for flotation devices that are meant for use by swimmers? Until these questions have data-driven answers, recommendations cannot be made for optimal life jacket or other floatation device design and use in nonboating situations. There is no agency or organization that tests and approves life jackets except for the Coast Guard in the U.S. and their focus is on boating-related activities. While a regulation may ultimately be useful, a standard will be a good place to start and will increase consistency and reliability in products being developed. A good example of this is National Marine Manufacturers Association American Boat and Yacht Council Standards for boat builders in which you can build to and reduce potential risk.

Anticipated Impact:

After implementing this recommendation, you can expect to experience the following outcomes.

  • The development of products that allow for water recreation while offering protection from drowning in the event of an unexpected loss of buoyancy leads to lives saved.
  • Designing floatation devices for swimmers helps overcome the common misconception that life jackets are only for people who do not know how to swim.

Evidence:

A report by Gilchrest and Parker (2014) provides evidence that drowning in natural water increases among teens and young adults. Alcohol use, increased independence, with resulting reduced supervision might play a role. Basic swimming skills might reduce risk. AI/AN children, teenagers, and young adults might be at higher risk because of greater exposure to natural bodies of water. Additionally, death certificates do not include details on known risk and protective factors such as the victim’s activities and swimming skill, body of water, weather conditions, health conditions, use of life jackets, fences, supervision, alcohol use and CPR. Of note, 25% are other or unspecified.

In a report on the epidemiology and prevention of drowning, Quan and Gilchrist (2020) report;

  • Life jackets in pools or natural bodies of water provide an extra layer of protection.
  • Many people swimming and playing in water do use some kind of flotation.
  • Policies vary as to whether life jackets are allowed in shallow or deep ends of pools or designated swim areas.
  • Many swim programs e.g. Red Cross include life jacket use as part of swim instruction.
  • Christian’s Law focuses on life jacket use in camps
  • Accepted and routine use of life jackets outside of boating environment is needed. Can build on the existing popularity of different types of flotation while swimming and wading.
  • Life jackets and other types of flotation remain technologies that are underdeveloped, under-promoted and under-utilized.

According to Safe Kids Worldwide (2018), while overall drownings have decreased by 28 percent, open water drownings have only decreased by 13 percent. 62 percent of drownings in natural water occurred in the presence of an adult (where data was available). As children age, their risk of open water drowning increases. Child death review (CDR) data indicates 10% of 10-17 year olds had used drugs or alcohol right before their death. Most were playing or swimming in natural water. Children under 5 most likely to drown after a fall into water making supervision and use of PFDs important. PFDs are also referenced for 15–19 year olds. Largest proportion are from urban areas. However rural children represent 27% of fatal open water drownings but only 15% of the population. Increased risk in rural areas may have to do with access. Based on CDR most are in lakes, rivers, ponds. Very few (4%) in the ocean. Safe Kids Worldwide recommends that at a minimum, children 13 years and under should be required to be in an approved PFD. States with PFD laws applying to older kids have overall higher wear rates. They also recommend PFD loaner programs at boat ramps and swim beaches. They recommend PFDs for weak and non-swimmers when around water.

Moran and authors (2005) state “Life jackets, also called personal flotation devices or PFDs, save lives. Life jackets can be used for swimming, wading and other water activities. Life jackets help you to be seen, making it easier to find and rescue you. Approved life jackets have been shown to be effective in reducing drowning deaths associated with boating activities (Cummings, Mueller, & Quan, in press; United States Coast Guard, 2003 ). Life jacket use has been promoted for children or weak swimmers recreating in and/or near water. Community based campaigns have led to the availability of life jacket loaner stations, which have been reported to saves lives (Bennett & Bernthal, 2001). No study to date has been conducted on the efficacy of life jacket use for nonboating activities such as wading or swimming. Further research is required to determine the effectiveness of life jacket use in aquatic recreational activity such as while swimming or playing in the water (Quan, Liller, & Bennett, 2006).

American Red Cross

The Aquatic Sub council chose to focus on an expanded set of indications for life jacket use because their use holds promise for decreasing the risk of drowning among those near water.

Vietnam, Alaska, and Washington State (U.S.) have promoted this intervention among children, while both Australia and New Zealand have focused on rock fishermen. An intervention by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers required life jacket wear among those not only on the water, but also by or swimming in their waters and led to a marked decrease in drowning deaths (Mangione & Chow, 2014). Wearing of life jackets by children less than 5 years of age also has been shown to decrease the risk of drowning death when playing by or near water (Yang, Nong, Li, Feng & Lo, 2007).

Evidence Sources:

Quan L, & Gilchrist J. (2022). The epidemiology and prevention of drowning. Boulton M.L., & Wallace R.B.(Eds.), Maxcy-Rosenau-Last Public Health & Preventive Medicine (16th ed.). McGraw Hill. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3078&sectionid=257531213

Gilchrist J., & Parker E.M. (2014) Racial/ethnic disparities in fatal unintentional drowning among persons aged <=29-United States 1999-2010. MMWR Weekly, 63(19), 421-426. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6319a2.htm MacKay J.M., Samuel E., & Green A. (2018). Hidden hazards: An exploration of open water drowning and risks for children. Safe Kids Worldwide. https://www.safekids.org/research-report/hidden-hazards-exploration-open-water-drowning-and-risks-kids Moran K., Quan L., Franklin R., & Bennett E. (2011). Where the evidence and expert opinion meet: A review of open water recreational safety messages. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 5(3), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.25035/ijare.05.03.05

Ramos W., Beale A., Chambers P., Dalke S., Fielding R., Kublick L., Langendorfer S., Lees T., Quan L., & Wernicki P. (2015). Primary and secondary downing interventions: The American Red Cross circle of drowning prevention and chain of drowning survival. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 9(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.25035/ijare.09.01.08

Quan L. (2014). Personal flotation devices. In J. Bierens (Ed), Drowning Prevention, Rescue, Treatment (2nd ed, pp. 225-229). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04253-9_33

Bennett, E., & Quan, L. (2018). Wearing life Jackets while swimming in open water. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 11(2), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.250035/ijare.11.02.02

Quan L, Mangione T, Bennett E et al Use of life jackets and other types of flotation for in-water recreation in designated swim areas in Washington State. Injury Prevention, 24, 123-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042296

High Risk Populations Addressed:

Populations whose risk of drowning decreases the most with the implementation of this recommendation may have one or more of the following characteristics:

  • Individuals playing, swimming or recreating in open water

Evaluation Metrics:

Indicators of long-term impact:

  • Swimmers and other water recreators outside of a boating environment are evaluated based on a developed standard
  • Consumers understand the difference between flotation that meets or doesn’t meet the standard
  • Manufacturers develop flotation that will meet the standard
  • -
  • Decrease in non-approved flotation available to consumers

Indicators of intermediate impact:

  • A standard has been enacted

Implementation:

Consider the following to ensure successful implementation:

  • Bring together multiple organizations, including government (such as the U.S. Coast Guard and Consumer Product Safety Commission), non-government organizations (such as National Drowning Prevention Alliance), and associations (such as the Life Jacket Association, National Safe Boating Council, National Marine Manufacturers Association and National Association of State Boating Law Administrators) to build consensus and support for a standard.
  • Consider who could potentially administer the standard and then a collective decision made about how to proceed.
  • Encourage collaboration and willingness to design the standard.
  • Revise the standard in order to ensure that the developed life jacket products offer a safety benefit to consumers.

Challenges to Implementation:

When implementing this recommendation, you might encounter challenges related to the following factors.

  • At present, no organization “owns” flotation devices designed for use by swimmers (i.e. the United States Coast Guard oversees life jackets designed for use on boats and has had a very limited role in life jackets for other uses.)
  • While there is some data verifying the use of life jackets or other flotation for people in swim areas, this use of life jackets or other flotation for people swimming or doing other forms of water recreation is somewhat novel, certainly for teens and adults, so development and support for a standard may be met with resistance.

Potential Facilitators:

The following factors might facilitate the implementation of this recommendation.

  • Several novel products are currently available to consumers, but there is a need to evaluate their safety and effectiveness. Water safety (e.g.. Red Cross, YMCA, USA Swimming) and Water Sports (e.g. open water swim organizations, triathlons, Iron Man) organizations might have an interest in partnering on exploration of this question both for competitive and for recreational swimmers.
  • The use of a Level 50 approval rating for a life jacket used by swimmers may be beneficial, the Level 50 is used in other countries including Europe.

GAP Recommendation:

We recommend that data-driven inquiries be conducted, based upon the types of situations and victims that are most likely to experience drowning while engaged in recreational water us. (Examples might include weak swimmers, or those with medical limitations, special needs or physical disabilities.) Once the epidemiology of such events are understood, those at risk for such events can be invited to participate in studies which explore their willingness to use a life jacket or other flotation device. What characteristics would they desire in such a product? The results of these inquiries could be shared with engineers and/or interested manufacturers, who could proceed with developing and testing the effectiveness and marketability of novel flotation devices that were designed to enhance safety without interfering with a user’s enjoyment of aquatic activities.