DS 17 Guide Data Sharing for Drowning Prevention within Privacy Regulations
Disseminate information to organizations managing existing data sources regarding how drowning-related data can be shared to support drowning prevention while staying within regulatory guidelines. Includes, but is not limited to: the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA) Privacy Rule.
Spectrum level: Changing Organizational Practices
Evidence level: Low
Implementation levels: National
Rationale:
Availability of timely and pertinent data to inform injury prevention measures is an important challenge in injury surveillance.
A covered entity may be reluctant to share injury information due to privacy concerns based on HIPPA, this recommendation can help bring clarity to regulatory guidelines so entities have a better understanding of appropriate sharing of injury data.
Anticipated Impact:
After implementing this recommendation, you can expect to experience the following outcomes.
- Disseminating information to organizations managing existing data sources regarding how drowning-related data can be shared to support drowning prevention while staying within regulatory guidelines leads to an improvement in surveillance through greater access to existing data.
Evidence:
Any health information generated or held by a covered entity that could be linked to an individual is protected health information (PHI). HIPAA (HHS 2013a) defines PHI as "any information" related to the "past, present or future physical or mental health condition" of a person. Only fully de-identified information is excluded, where every explicit identifier has been removed, as well as data that could potentially establish identity via statistical techniques. Under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act’s amendments to HIPAA, patients now have a right to request electronic copies of records where the covered entity has an electronic records system.
However, per 45 CFR 164.512(b), The Privacy Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information, without authorization, to public health authorities who are legally authorized to receive such reports for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability. This would include, for example, the reporting of a disease or injury; reporting vital events, such as births or deaths; and conducting public health surveillance, investigations, or interventions. Drowning is reportable in only some states such as Texas (within 10 days) and Ohio. State laws that are contrary to the Privacy Rule are preempted by the Federal requirements, unless a specific exception applies. These exceptions include if the State law provides for the reporting of disease or injury, child abuse, birth, or death, or for public health surveillance, investigation, or intervention.
A “public health authority” is an agency or authority of the United States government, a State, a territory, a political subdivision of a State or territory, or Indian tribe that is responsible for public health matters as part of its official mandate, as well as a person or entity acting under a grant of authority from, or under a contract with, a public health agency (see 45 CFR 164.501). Examples of a public health authority include State and local health departments, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
Covered entities are required reasonably to limit the protected health information disclosed for public health purposes to the minimum amount necessary to accomplish the public health purpose. For routine and recurring public health disclosures, covered entities may develop standard protocols, as part of their minimum necessary policies and procedures, that address the types and amount of protected health information that may be disclosed for such purposes. Constraints flow from non-government sources as well, such as certification organizations like The Joint Commission and medical organizations such as the American Medical Association.
Research involving deceased individuals is not human subjects research according to 45 CFR 46.102(f) and does not require IRB oversight unless the research involves both living and deceased individuals. However, to maintain the privacy of the PHI of the deceased, and to maintain the confidentiality of the deceased subject’s family, research that uses the deceased subject’s data should be undertaken only if the information is de-identified by an honest broker service, or, is pursuant to a valid research authorization signed by the administrator or executor of the deceased individual’s estate or the person who is listed as next of kin.
Evidence Sources:
Disclosures for Public Health Activiites [45 CFR 164.512(b)] available at https://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pdf/ocr_publichealth.pdf Accessed on June 15, 2021
Code of Federal Regulations TITLE 45 PUBLIC WELFARE Department of Health and Human Services PART 46 PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf Accessed on June 15, 2021
High Risk Populations Addressed:
All populations can benefit from implementation of this recommendation.
Evaluation Metrics:
Indicators of long-term impact:
- Identification or development of educational materials
- Enhanced dissemination efforts with greater reach
- Documentation of inclusion in trainings
- Increased collaboration between Public Health, organizations, and medical providers around the examination of drowning data
- Increased ease of accessing information on fatal and nonfatal drowning
Indicators of intermediate impact:
- Increased documentation of policy changes around providing information when requested by Public Health
- Favorable changes in knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs following educational or training efforts
Indicators of initial impact:
- Enhanced dissemination efforts and reach
- Increased number of people trained
Implementation:
Consider the following to ensure successful implementation:
- Disseminate the document: DISCLOSURES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES [45 CFR 164.512(b)] to covered entities such as hospitals and institutions.
- Disseminate the document 45 CFR 46.102(f) which defines human subjects research.
- Create a fact sheet to highlight the circumstances under which protected information can be released.
- Consider education through existing HIPAA certification courses Follow up needed to determine the results of educational and training effects
Challenges to Implementation:
When implementing this recommendation, you might encounter challenges related to the following factors.
- Impediments in applying these rules related to the dissemination of these statutes to covered entities and public health authorities do exist.
- The legal ability for public health to have access to these data may be well known to researchers in academic institutions but not to others.
Potential Facilitators:
The following factors might facilitate the implementation of this recommendation.
- Support from academic institutions and the NIH.
- Knowledge of the Privacy rule and its exemption for reporting of injuries such as drowning will assist covered entities in sharing injury data with state and territorial jurisdictions in a timely manner (particularly important when there is no state-mandated reporting requirement for drowning).
- Research involving deceased individuals does not constitute human subjects research, public health, governmental and forensic authorities, therefore, it may be more amenable with sharing fatality data among researchers with applicable safeguards.
GAP Recommendation:
The prevalence of refusal to share data based on misunderstandings of HIPAA regulations is not available. Most researchers can share anecdotal reports that support this as an important barrier to surveillance and research, but the exact burden is not known.